Eaten Alive by Ronald F. Marshall
Eaten Alive
In Removing the Fear from the Story of Jonah, Children’s Versions
Remove the Gospel, Too
by Ronald F. Marshall
Jonah is a horrifying book, with its raging storm and fierce sea-monster,
a suicide attempt and near drowning, and, at the end, a confrontation with
a massive enemy city. But in American children’s literature it is largely
a harmless adventure story, all about travel and intrigue, underwater hideouts,
success and fame.
Jonah may not have been eaten alive in the Bible, but he has been in the
children’s books. In the nineteen versions I examined for this essay,
the horror of the story has been extracted and removed from sight, and with
it an important theological and imaginative preparation for the gospel.
Disobedient Jonah
Let us begin with the evasion of Jonah’s disobedience. Why did Jonah
not obey God when he was first asked to go to Nineveh? Only at the end of the
biblical book does Jonah intimate that he did not obey because of God’s
unbearable, excessive leniency with his enemies in Nineveh (4:2). But even
with that sketchy explanation, his disobedience remains puzzling, for he is,
as Old Testament scholar James Limburg notes, “the only one of the prophets
to run away . . . before delivering his message.”
Jonah’s disobedience is mostly ignored in the children’s books
(cited only by their authors’ names here; please see the Sources sidebar
for complete citations). But some versions exonerate him (Brown, De Graaf,
Osborne). Some say he did not go to Nineveh because the evil there was too
scary (Bauman, David, Hoth, Karran Wright), others that the trip would have
been too taxing (Kenney, Nystrom), and still another says that he simply wasn’t
interested in Nineveh (Lanning).
All these books effectively justify Jonah’s disobedience. They present
him as a celebrated rebel. He’s able to out-maneuver God and avoid obeying
his command. So Jonah’s rebellion is not damning. Rather it authenticates
him, marking him out as a free man choosing his own way in life.
But romanticizing Jonah in this way—thinking of him as some sort of
glorious challenger of God—shears away the horror of his actual disobedience.
The books forget how crucial God considers obedience to be, since, as Martin
Luther noted in The Large Catechism, he is “so strict about
punishing those who transgress it.”
The disobedient Jonah surely would appeal to children who do not like being
told what to do, which may explain why the writers so radically change the
biblical story. They describe a Jonah blithely sailing along, oblivious to
the consequences of his deeds, which not only diminishes the deadly effects
of disobeying God but also makes much of the story that follows incomprehensible.
I am tempted to shake my finger and quote Galatians 6:7 at them, saying, “God
is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow.”
Suicidal Jonah
On the ship to Tarshish, once the crew finds out that Jonah’s disobedience
has jeopardized them, Jonah tells them to drown him in the sea in order to
stop the threatening storm. Almost all the children’s versions I examined
skip over this.
One book simply says, “Then Jonah was thrown overboard” (Davidson).
Others say that after the sailors heard Jonah’s confession, they threw
him overboard, but do not say that they did so at his request (Pingry, David).
Another has the crew telling him to walk the plank into the sea on his own
(Kenney).
Others mitigate the whole episode, saying that as soon as Jonah hit the water,
he was swallowed up by the whale (Kenney, Egermeier). Such a quick deliverance
clearly mitigates the trauma. Another trivializes it by saying, “Heave
ho! into the water. Splash!”—with accompanying pleasing pictures
(Harrast).
Still another says that Jonah’s request to die was only made “unhappily” and “mournfully” (Buck).
So he only reluctantly offers up his life, without the despondent death-wish
the biblical story conveys. This makes the scene look more like being splashed
at a pool party than going down into the watery deeps of depression and suicide,
which are the fruits of Jonah’s disobedience.
That depression, however, remains on the pages of the book of Jonah. And
it will not go away simply by being ignored. One day these young readers of
Jonah will see the actual biblical version and discover Jonah’s anxiety
and sadness. This is a fear, they will surprisingly learn, born of those watery
deeps of depression and suicide. It is a fear a reading of the biblical story
of Jonah might have prepared them for.
The sailors find out about Jonah’s guilt by casting lots. Jonah does
not dispute the drawing but comes out of hiding and says he is to blame. Only
a few of the children’s versions mention this part of the story at all
(Kenney, Osborne, Karran Wright). One actually transforms it into playing the
card game “Go Fish” (Kenney). Another devotes over six pages to
the episode but still leaves out the casting of lots (Nystrom).
This matter of casting lots raises the mysterious business of discerning
what is hidden. While we would want our children to be honest and straightforward,
the book of Jonah uses mysterious devices to pry open the truth by less than
straightforward means. In this book we are told they are needed because Jonah
is deceptive.
But the children’s versions seem to think that Jonah will entice young
readers into a life of relying on luck and chance instead of trusting in God’s
providential care. This concern for children’s character (if that is
the reason for the avoidance) hides from children something that is part of
the very life revealed in the Bible. Think of the disciples casting lots to
find a replacement for Judas (Acts 1:21–26).
Sacrificial Jonah
All the children’s versions mention, and then quickly pass over, the
fact that God sends the storm in anger and then quells it when Jonah is thrown
overboard (Jonah 1:4,11–12,15). Clearly his sacrifice calms the wrath
of God manifest in the raging sea. (The fact that Jonah does not die does not
thereby vacate this appeasement. All it does is shift it from ghastly dying
to tormented living.)
Apparently, the children’s writers think that beholding such a vivid,
destructive example of the divine wrath will upset children and perhaps scare
them away from God. But this casts suspicion on Christ’s sacrifice on
the cross.
The New Testament itself presses this connection when it says that only the “sign
of Jonah” will point to Christ (Matt. 12:39; Luke 11:29). Just as Jonah
was thrown to his (expected) death in the sea to save the sailors from the
storm, so are we, “the entire boat of humanity,” as the church
father Jerome put it, saved from sin by Jesus when he is nailed to his death
on the cross. So Jonah’s headlong leap into the deadly sea prefigures
Jesus’ willing ascent to die on the cross.
“God’s vengeance did not fall on the sinners, but on the only
sinless one, the Son of God, who stood in the place of sinners. Jesus Christ
bore the vengeance of God,” Dietrich Bonhoeffer says in his last published
book, The Prayerbook of the Church.
Christ calmed God’s anger against sin. . . . That was the end of all
false thoughts about the love of a God who does not take sin very seriously.
God hates and judges [his enemies] in the only righteous one, the one who prays
for forgiveness for God’s enemies. Only in the cross of Jesus Christ
is the love of God to be found.
This is what children need to know about Jonah, to see that his sacrifice
and its meaning prefigured Christ’s. Covering up why Jonah had to be
thrown overboard hides from them an important truth of Christianity, one that
will help them understand the gospel.
Damned Jonah
Even though the giant fish rescues Jonah from drowning, “the sea becomes
Jonah’s deathbed. There he must die all alone, with no one about to comfort
him,” Luther wrote in his Lectures on Jonah:
God takes on a glowering mien. It seems that His anger is not appeased by
the death . . . to which Jonah is willing to submit, and that He cannot avenge
Himself fiercely enough on him. It must have been a horrifying sight to poor,
lost, and dying Jonah when the whale opened his mouth wide and he beheld sharp
teeth that stood upright all around like pointed pillars or beams and he peered
down the wide cellar entrance to the belly.
Jacques Ellul writes similarly in The Judgment of Jonah: The “fish
was sent primarily to swallow up, to destroy, to put to death. It was not a
means of saving. . . . The intervention of the fish, then, is not at all a
sign of grace, of Jonah delivered from the waters. On the contrary . . . it
is damnation. The fish is in fact hell.”
This terrifying but no less true picture is missing from all but a couple
of the children’s books (Nystrom, Stattgart). The whale is usually rendered
as a cute and cuddly playmate (even Marc Chagall’s famous drawing of
Jonah in the whale has him safely at home inside its belly). No horrifying
looks. No sharp teeth. This gigantic sea creature is turned into Jonah’s
playful buddy.
No doubt they write and draw like this to get God off the hook, so that he
cannot be accused of sending a terrifying sea monster to torment Jonah. In
doing so, they deny God’s wrath and promote some “God of fluff
and gentility,” in the words of Jim McGuiggan in Celebrating the
Wrath of God.
But again, this is a lie we should quit telling our children. We do not bring
them to God by pretending that he is cuddly and not terrible. For his wrath
is real (John 3:36; Rom. 2:5–8).
Sulking Jonah
Only a few versions (Brown, Buck, De Graaf, Egermeier, Kenney, Nystrom, Karran
Wright) include the last scene, in which God sends the worm to eat the shade
tree he had sent the day before. All give Jonah a happy ending, whether they
include this last scene or not. None of them leaves Jonah pouting and sulking,
as the Bible does.
And in this, too, they rob children of an important insight. In the killing
of the plant we see, writes Old Testament scholar Bruce Vawter, that God “is
not kind to his chosen emissaries, and anyone who does not understand this
fact is incapable of understanding biblical history.”
Kierkegaard stunningly ties this story to Jesus’ instruction in Matthew
5:44 to love our enemies. When God destroys the tree, he is being “so
terrible” to Jonah. If this is the way God loves his servants, there
are no “syrupy sweets” in it at all. Rather, the “strenuous
and sacrificial” marks this love.
Because God is so rough on us, Jesus said we should love our enemies—knowing
full well that God is our “most appalling enemy.” Loving our enemies
is primarily about loving God. Therefore, Kierkegaard concludes, “God
wants you to die, to die to the world; he hates specifically that in which
you naturally have your life, to which you cling with all your zest for life.”
God makes Jonah miserable, but for his own good. He breaks apart his worldly
hopes and dreams and pushes him into a new life. He shows him that his own
comfort does not matter. He calls Jonah to set his mind “on things that
are above, not on things that are on earth”—things like some wilting
shade tree (Col. 3:2). And for all this cruel treatment, Jonah is to love God
anyway, simply because Matthew 5:44 says we are to love and not hate our enemies.
Thinking of God as our enemy never even remotely shows up in these children’s
versions of Jonah. This is a huge loss, not only because it misrepresents the
book of Jonah, but also because it waters down biblical faith and the new life
it brings through the daily denial of ourselves (Luke 9:23).
Unforgiving Jonah
The supposed rhetorical question at the end of the book of Jonah condemns
Jonah for his cruelty. The prevailing understanding of the message of the book
is that “deliverance belongs to the Lord” (Jonah 2:9). Therefore,
if God wants to be merciful to sinful people and not give them what they deserve,
but love them instead, so be it. And the rightness of this wild, risky, divine
extension of love is the center of the argument between God and Jonah.
Why would Jonah oppose such a message? Why will he not change his mind about
his enemies in Nineveh? Not because he is unwilling ever to forgive foreigners,
but because he believes God has underestimated Nineveh’s recidivism.
As a result of this divine oversight, Israel’s safety is thrown into
jeopardy. To protect Israel, Jonah has to oppose God’s reckless love
for Nineveh. Otherwise, Nineveh would remain free to attack Israel with its
far superior force.
And, as one children’s version surprisingly points out (Hoth), the
Book of Nahum shows that Nineveh finally had to be destroyed precisely because
it failed to make good on the repentance championed after hearing Jonah preach
(3:6–7,18–19). But apart from the mention in Hoth, nothing like
this harsh reading of Nineveh and God finds its way into these children’s
versions of Jonah. But if it did, they would offer children a salutary realism
that would teach them an important lesson about the lacerating power of God’s
Word (Jer. 23:29; Heb. 4:12).
Terrifying Tales
In the children’s versions of Jonah, the story has been sentimentalized
and its horror has been removed, and thereby its power as the word of God has
been removed as well. But such children’s versions can become more realistic
and biblically sound in the future. The key, I think, is in being as terrifying
as the classic fairy tales.
These tales—themselves usually sentimentalized in modern retellings—teach
children that “much of what goes wrong in life is due to our very own
natures—the propensity of all men for acting aggressively, asocially,
selfishly, out of anger and anxiety,” as Bruno Bettelheim puts it in The
Uses of Enchantment. But “the dominant culture wishes to pretend,
particularly where children are concerned, that the dark side of man does not
exist.”
Children experience anxious and destructive feelings. They can, for example,
love their parents dearly, “but at times also hate them.” These
upsetting feelings must be explored rather than covered up. “By keeping
this monster within the child unspoken of . . . the child fails to get to know
his monster better” and so loses the chance to “gain mastery over
it.”
Against these illusions, the fairy tales stand with all their frightfulness—insisting
on telling the truth. And the truth is indeed scary. And it is a truth that
children can handle, indeed need to face.
This insight must guide the telling of the story of Jonah to our children.
Forget about cleaning up Jonah. Instead, tell the story the Bible tells. It
is the story God wants your children to hear.
Bruce Vawter’s quote is taken from his Job & Jonah; Kierkegaard’s from his The
Moment and Late Writings; and Jerome’s
from The Twelve Prophets, edited by Alberto Ferreiro.
Bibliography
From the mountain of children’s materials on Jonah, the author selected the following nineteen as representative of the current publications in English.
Children’s Books
• Amery, Heather, Jonah and the Whale, illustrated by Norman Young (Usborne Publishing, 1996).
• Bauman, Amy, Jonah and the Whale, illustrated by MADA Design (Meredith Books, 1996).
• Brown, Janet Allison, Jonah and the Whale, illustrated by Summer Durantz (Gingham Dog Press, 2003).
• Davidson, Alice Joyce, Jonah & the Big Fish, illustrated by Tammie Lyon (Zondervan, 1997).
• Harrast, Tracy, Jonah Goes Overboard, illustrated by Carl More (Zondervan, 1999).
• Josephs, Mary, Jonah and the Whale, illustrated by Benrei Huang (Random House, 1994).
• Kenney, Cindy, Jonah: A Worm’s Eye View, illustrated by Big Idea Design (Zondervan, 2003).
• Lanning, Rosemary, Jonah and the Whale, illustrated by Bernadette Watts (North-South Books, 2001).
• Nystrom, Carolyn, You, Jonah!, illustrated by Sharon Dahl (Moody, 1998).
• Pingry, Patricia A., Jonah and the Fish, illustrated by Stacey Venturi-Pickett (Candy Cane Press, 2005).
Children’s Bibles
• Buck, Pearl S., The Story Bible (G. K. Hall, 1971, 1984).
• David, Juliet, Candle Bible for Toddlers, illustrated by Helen Prole (Kregel, 2006).
• De Graaf, Anne, The Little Children’s Bible Storybook, illustrated by José Peréz Muntero (Scandinavian Publishing House, 2002). • Egermeier, Elsie E.,
Bible Story Book (Warner Press, 1922, 1969).
• Hoth, Iva, The Picture Bible, illustrated by Andre Le Blanc (Cook, 1978, 2004).
• Osborne, Rick, et al., Bedtime Bible, illustrated by A. Patricia Jaster (Tyndale,
2002).
• Sattgart, L. J., The Rhyme Bible, illustrated by Toni Goffe (Zondervan, 1996).
• Wright, Sally Ann, A Child’s Bible, illustrated by Honor Ayres (Standard, 2005).
Video
• Wright, Karran Eccles, Jonah: The Greatest Adventure Stories from the Bible (Hanna-Barbera, 1992).
Changing the Sign
According to the Koran, Jesus was
not crucified on the cross. Some have it that he never was nailed
to the cross but a look-alike was nailed there in his place,
perhaps Thomas or Judas; others that he was nailed to the cross
but was taken down and later resuscitated in the tomb.
On this view, the sign of Jonah (Matt.
12:39; Luke 11:29) says that Jesus will not die because Jonah
did not die in the belly of the whale, and that alone is the
true but forgotten point of comparison between Jesus and Jonah.
This argument is made by Ahmed Deedat in Was Jesus Crucified?,
published by the Library of Islam.
Islam denies the Atonement for two
reasons. First, “the Christian concept of salvation presupposes
the existence of an a-priori state of sinfulness, which
is justified in Christianity by the doctrine of ‘original
sin,’ but is not justified in Islam, which does not subscribe
to this doctrine,” as one highly esteemed Koranic scholar,
Muhammad Asad, put it.
Second, Islam denies vicarious suffering. The Koran teaches that we
have to bear the burden for our sins all by ourselves. So the teaching
that Jesus bore our sins in his body on the cross (1 Peter 2:24) is
a corruption of the original revelation, the original coming in the
Koran, where we are told that God gave to Jesus the way of good works.
By following them we have peace with God.
The Koran describes salvation as repenting
of sin and obeying God just as Jonah did. Jesus’ life reinforces
this way. This is all that is left for Jesus to do if original
sin and vicarious suffering are denied, as they are in Islam
(and much of liberal Christianity). The sign of Jonah is the
way of good works.
— Ronald F. Marshall
|
Ronald F. Marshall is pastor at First Lutheran Church of West Seattle in Seattle, Washington, where he has served since 1979. He has published essays on Luther and Kierkegaard. he and his wife of 35 years have three grown children. |