touchstone archives
Commonplaces
Piquant excerpts lifted from Touchstone editors' own reading & listening.
What is so striking and particular about the woke culture is that it is using the language of Christendom but with a different goal. In a subtle and subversive way it intends to restore the priority of the primacy of power. It uses victimhood as a way of both bolstering up relativism and stripping moral authority away from objective truth and Christian ethical values. . . .
But it also poses an important theological challenge to the Church. A whole culture has been built on the sanctification of victimhood. The sacrifice of Christ on the cross [takes] weakness and brokenness that flow from the vulnerability of Love and uses [them] to provide freedom and forgiveness from guilt and moral condemnation. But when “victimhood” is detached from Jesus and used as a means to a different end, used instead to claim moral high ground but with the intention not of freeing and forgiving but of displacing and condemning, something different and terrible is happening. We should become more alert to the danger of the corruption of our own language and values and not [be] taken in by appearances. Not all victimhood is virtuous.
We should do more than accept its currency at face value, asking instead what the concept is being used for. Is it rooted in sacrifice and mercy, a process in which pain and suffering are offered transformatively, producing forgiveness and compassion flowing from a voluntary acceptance of suffering to bring good to another? This is the Christian model. Or is it being used as a means of blackmailing an opponent who caused pain and damage and [as] ethical leverage to exercise a moral power that is intended to produce revenge or reparation for some kind of physical, sexual or political abuse? A means, in other words, of exchanging one kind of power for another.
The differences between these two kinds of suffering depend firstly upon whether the victim is willing to forgive and secondly [on] what the outcome is intended to be. The competition for the allegiance of our culture is no longer the straightforward choice between power and compassion, Nietzsche and Jesus. Our opponents have become more subtle and have clothed their will for power and revenge in the trappings of love and compassion. We need to exercise discernment and intelligent discrimination to tell the difference.
—Gavin Ashenden
“Coercive Victimhood—The Trojan Horse of Cultural Change,” The Catholic Herald (July 26, 2022)
— society — Commonplaces #153 — Nov/Dec 2022 —
All content © The Fellowship of St. James — 2024. All rights reserved.
Returns, refunds, and privacy policy.