Bernard Aparicio writes at the blog at Dappled Things about the vocation of teaching and the goal of education through the lens of a fictional and fascinating “plague of insomnia.” (He is also the author of The Possible Dream: The Quixotic Wisdom of Don Quijote’s Sancho in the July/August 2010 issue of Touchstone.) His story of how he discovered meaning in education beyond training is encouraging.
By Greg Laughlin
In 1895, Oscar Wilde was convicted of “gross indecency” and sentenced to two years’ hard labor. The term “gross indecency” was an legal euphemism for homosexual behavior. As a result of his conviction, the librarians at the St. Louis Public Library and the Newark Public Library removed Wilde’s books from their collections. The books had been on the shelves for a while and the librarians apparently had no objection to their contents. The librarians removed them strictly because they disapproved of the behavior for which Wilde was convicted. In 1984, in her book, Forbidden Books in American Public Libraries, 1876-1939: A Study in Cultural Change, Evelyn Geller used this incident to criticize censorship, specifically, in this case, censorship based on disapproval of the author, not his works.
Today, Orson Scott Card finds himself in a somewhat similar situation, again because of “gross indecency.” However, this time, the author’s “gross indecency” was having the temerity to condemn homosexuality and oppose same-sex “marriage.” A group called “Geeks OUT” is calling for a boycott of the movie Ender’s Game, based on Card’s best-selling and award-winning book of the same title. The movie, which stars Academy Award winner Ben Kingsley and Oscar nominees Harrison Ford, Viola Davis, Hailee Steinfeld, and Abigail Breslin, is scheduled to open in theaters on November 1, 2013.
On its web site promoting the boycott, Geeks OUT quotes Card from a February 1990 article in Sunstone Magazine: “Laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books, not to be indiscriminately enforced against anyone who happens to be caught violating them, but to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those who flagrantly violate society’s regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society.”
Geeks OUT also points to Card being a board member of the National Organization for Marriage, an organization which has worked to prevent legal recognition of same-sex “marriage.”
As with Oscar Wilde, the opposition to Ender’s Game has absolutely nothing to do with its content. Geeks OUT is calling for a boycott specifically because of Card’s conduct. There is division within the gay rights community over this call for a boycott. Oscar-winning writer and gay rights activist Dustin Lance Black has criticized the boycott, calling it “misguided.”
Free speech advocates who are aware of the censorship of Wilde’s work nearly 120 years ago condemn it as an indefensible act. And so it was. I am sure that those who are calling for boycotts of Ender’s Game would be among those condemning it if they are aware of it. And they would likely do so for the simple fact that an author’s conduct which has no relationship whatsoever to his work is an especially bad reason to censor it.
Admittedly, there is a difference between calling for a boycott of a movie and pulling a book from a library shelf. The former is a call for private action. The latter is a state action. Legally, they are different. But the spirit behind them is the same. As Dustin Lance Black observed, efforts to punish writers for their conduct unrelated to their work by in any way censoring their work is “misguided.” Further, it represents an intolerance which groups like Geeks OUT purport to condemn. Let’s hope that Geeks OUT recognizes this and withdraws their call for a boycott of Ender’s Game. Otherwise, they will, in time, come to be identified with the long list of those who have sought to censor authors and artists not for the content of their works, but because they disapprove of their conduct.
In this video, San Francisco’s Catholic Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone spends 25 minutes with Orthodox Priest Fr. Josiah Trenham discussing “gay marriage,” its rise, and its roots in the 60s.
READERS will be interested in Circe Institute’s summer conference, July 16-19, Baltimore, Maryland, on the topic: “A CONTEMPLATION OF JUDGEMENT” Speakers include Touchstone‘s Ken Myers (Contours of Culture) and also Touchstone authors Dr. John Patrick (author of “The Guilty Generation,” Vigen Gurioan (author of 7 Touchstone features), among others. A description of the topic:
The carelessness of the conventional mind is reflected in its judgment that one should never judge. The trouble is, thinking, opining, and speaking are already and always judgments. We humans are incessantly, inescapably moral beings, and that is our glory.
The question is not whether we will judge, but whether we will judge wisely. It’s hard to imagine a more practical question.
To teach is to judge. To teach is to teach a student how to judge. Everything we do, from writing to singing, from throwing a football to playing a piano, from teaching to assessing, from planning to fund-raising, requires judgment. As Thomas Aquinas wrote, ‘it is the part of the wise man to order and to judge”.
Judge well and be wise. Judge badly and be foolish.
Which do you want for your children and students?
Join us this July as, for the twelfth consective year, we contemplate the purpose, essence, and practice of Christian classical education at the 2013 CiRCE Conference: A Contemplation of Judgment, as we contemplate how best to provide an education that cultivates wisdom and virtue, that produces students able to judge wisely what is Good and True and Beautiful.
I received this cheering message earlier today:
Greetings from South Bend!
You may be interested to hear that my July/August 2012 Touchstone article, “Passing Through the Sirens: The Trials of the Christian Wayfarer in the World,” won an essay competition sponsored by the Character Project and Templeton Foundation. The press release is here. Thank you again for the opportunity to publish, and long live Touchstone!
University of Notre Dame
It’s always gratifying to win awards. Congratulations to David Elliot and his family!
Here is a snippet from the article:
Interestingly, those born after Christ are living in a sort of twilight period between the ages. With the victory won through the Passion and Resurrection of Christ, this aion is already a dissolving phantasmagoria; a sort of theatre burning to the ground while the Christians point to the Exit sign and the worldlings keep munching popcorn. (Read more)
I would be foolish, though a bit less aggressive, if I did not take this opportunity to ask readers to help Touchstone “live long” by making a gift today. Donations made to the publisher are tax-deductible, but more importantly, they help us provide such high-quality articles in the service of building up the Body of Christ in faith, hope, and love. Perhaps you aren’t currently a subscriber–subscribing today would also help keep Touchstone going on into the future, as long as the Lord wills.
What you subsidize is what you’ll get more of–and the Federal Government’s push to get more pills into the hands of young girls to make sure that they don’t have to face the decision of whether or not to go to see the local abortionist is only going to increase promiscuity and the number of abortions. That’s my conclusion after reading John Jansen’s report at LifeSiteNews. Why? Because it’s already happened and is documented here. A 1998 “press release contained this comment from one Dr. Anita Nelson, an Ob/Gyn professor at UCLA”:
It is estimated that nearly 50 percent of all abortions and unintended pregnancies in this country could be avoided if women had access to emergency contraception.
“That’s no small prediction. And looking back, it’s turned out to be not simply wrong, but astoundingly wrong.”
Who decides these things? Are they stupid? Are they the same people who tout “science” when it suits their agenda, but ignore empirical evidence that a policy does not work? When you keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect to get different results, isn’t that insanity?
Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Greg Lukianoff unpacks the latest Big Fed maneuver to control speech on campus through some pretty broad guidelines as to what now constitutes sexual harassment. Addressing a Title Iv and Title IX case at the University of Montana, a letter came to UM from the Justice Department and the Education Department:
But the joint letter, which announced a “resolution agreement” with the university, didn’t stop there. It then proceeded to rewrite the federal government’s rules about sexual harassment and free speech on campus.
Lukianoff is President of FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education). He writes:
The implications for professors and students are enormous. An unsuccessful request for a date, or even assigning a potentially offensive book like “Lolita,” could now be construed as harassment. As attorney and civil libertarian Wendy Kaminer commented on The Atlantic’s website this week: “The stated goal of this policy is stemming discrimination, but the inevitable result will be advancing it, in the form of content-based prohibitions on speech.”
It seems there is a growing “right not to be offended.” Also, students in some cases may be punished before guilt or innocence is even determined!
Lukianoff is also the author of Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate. And an atheist. His book is the subject of an article by Les Sillars, Professor of Journalism at Patrick Henry College in Virginia. The article is “Lukianoff’s Ashes: What a Candid Postmodernist Might Do to an Atheist’s Book Exposing Campus Censorship.” Sillars takes us to a campus book burning where Lukianoff is denounced by the Vice President of the Office of Intellectual Diversity. (Should Lukianoff now watch out for the IRS?)
Denyse O’Leary is on to something when she writes about the clearly growing unease that scientists who think science is the only path to true knowledge have with the Big Bang Theory. “Serious materialist atheists are well aware of its theistic implications and seek various ways to discredit it.”
Manufacturing doubts about the Big Bang
The Big Bang: Fireworks still on despite downpour?
Still under construction: A No Big Bang Universe
The “I hate the Big Bang” Cosmology Club
Hence, Multiverses are now the rage. So Christians are medieval and unscientific for believing in some heaven beyond our world, but scientists can state with a straight face that there are billions of universes–only we just can’t ever see them? Or (the latest) that Nothing existed, and then Nothing spit out our universe? Nothing? May favorite, though, if that there is an infinite number of universes from which ours happily came into being. So an atheist posits that something Infinite had to cause our world? Well, it’s not much, but maybe that’s a step in the right direction…..
A ond-day conference will be held at Gloria Dei Lutheran Church on Chicago’s southwest side near Midway Airport, sponsored by Gottesdienst: The Journal of Lutheran Theology, edited by Rev. Fr. Burnell F. Eckardt Jr. (see his Touchstone article, Nursery Crimes, Jan/Feb 2013). Rumor has it that Fr. Patrick Henry Reardon is planning to attend this conference. See you there? The cost is $12.