Mr. President,
Earlier today you made a statement that will go down in history as one of the most audacious ever made by a sitting President.
And no, I’m not talking about your admission that you supports gay marriage. The only thing surprising about that revelation is that you decided to stop lying about your position before the election.
No, I’m referring to the fact that you’ve made one of the most theologically ignorant claims in modern history:
This is something that, you know, we’ve talked about over the years and she, you know, she feels the same way, she feels the same way that I do. And that is that, in the end the values that I care most deeply about and she cares most deeply about is how we treat other people and, you know, I, you know, we are both practicing Christians and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others but, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule, you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated. And I think that’s what we try to impart to our kids and that’s what motivates me as president and I figure the most consistent I can be in being true to those precepts, the better I’ll be as a as a dad and a husband and hopefully the better I’ll be as president.”
Considering that you once defined sin as “being out of alignment with my values,” it’s not surprising that you quickly gloss over all that “Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf” stuff (presumably Jesus died on the cross to save us from our misaligned personal values, right?). But your implying that Jesus supports same-sex marriage—and there really is no other way to interpret your statement—is nothing short of blasphemous.
No, Mr. President, Jesus does not support same-sex marriage. Even a liberal Christian like you should not be able to make such an historically and theologically absurd claim with a straight face. The history of Christian thought on sexual ethics from the time of the stoning of Stephen to the Stonewall riots has been consistent that engaging in homosexual behavior is strictly and clearly prohibited by God’s Word.
Indeed, Mr. President, you’ve embraced a position that even the godless pagans of antiquity would have considered too radical to for decent people to champion. Admittedly, we now live in a culture so morally obtuse that we can look to barbarians and heathens as moral exemplars on the issue of marriage, so maybe we shouldn’t blame you for not tacking with the political winds. Also, you’ve never been one to exhibit moral courage, and it would have required more than you could muster to stand against your party’s big-money immoralists in an election year.
Nevertheless, to imply that Jesus would support same-sex marriage is contemptible. I realize it probably won’t hurt you come election time—too many Christians are more concerned about saving your seat in the Oval Office than they are with slander against our Savior—but I encourage you to repent of your blasphemy.
Please, Mr. President, for once in your career set aside your magnificent ego and humbly admit that you don’t know what you’re talking about. I’m praying that you’ll do the right thing and admit you were wrong. If not, you’ll discover that God and history are harsh judges with long memories.











[...] another for a professed Christian to bear false witness about Christ to make the point. That is why Joe Carter doesn’t mince words in an open letter to President Obama. Carter [...]
What a sadly bitter and personal attack article. You could have written “I really don’t like you” a few times and it would have communicated much the same.
Did you have this kind of moral outrage at the violent deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq when that was done by a President under the banner of crusading for Christ? Some perspective, please.
The difference, as I see it Sam, is that the President is not just expressing his agreement with same-sex marriage (which is his perogative), but he is saying that Jesus, Himself, sanctions same-sex marriage. It’s one thing to say you would enjoy going to a pig roast. It’s quite another to say that the Muslim prophet Muhammed sanctions pig roasts.
Bush said in an interview that God told him to go to war, which is pretty akin to saying that God was happy with all that death and righteous slaying.
Oh and Jesus didn’t say a damned thing about homosexuality, that was all OT stuff.
The only way one can justify the “Jesus never said anything about homosexuality” line (which is, technically, true) is by removing Jesus entirely from the context of the Bible, as if he were some sort of abstract concept and not a person of history.
Both the OT, which he accepted as the Word of God, and the NT, which he endorsed (including those pesky letters of Paul, whom he commissioned), clearly and obviously maintain that marriage as God ordained it exists only between a man and a woman and that homosexual behaviour is abhorrent.
You don’t have to like him, but you don’t get to make Jesus in your image.
Its interesting to see that people who disagree from Christs view try to deflect it on Bush II as an excuse but can not disagree with Christ or the Bibles stance directly.
Didn’t even know this is how Obama felt, Reminds me of the book of judges when everyman did what was right in his own eyes. How much worse when your leader doesn’t even know the Biblical Christ. We should pray for him. http://heroseagain.wordpress.com/
Please. May we ask for a more “guile-less” response? While I agree with Joe’s root charge of “blasphemy”, the spirit of malice and antipathy in which this letter is written is clearly not the “Spirit of Christ”. Maybe re-writing the letter in a few days when the emotional heat isn’t quite as intense…? Blessings of the truth and grace of Jesus to you. JSB
JS,
I don’t think Joe Carter is too ‘heated’ for calling the president blasphemous. The president has to live with his statements–and they were blasphemous. There really is no way of stating that in a blog without someone thinking it too ‘heated.’
Amen, JSB. Well said.
I do not agree with The President’s stand on gay marriage, but I do not see, in any way or form, that he’s claiming that Jesus sanctions same sex-marriage. Talk about putting words in someone’s mouth!
I don’t agree with there only being one way to interpret his statement. The abundance of “you know”s in his statement tell me that it wasn’t prepared in advance. This was a response off the top of his head, and the center of it was treating others as you would be treated, not a believe that Jesus would support it too. He definitely expanded on the Golden Rule more than Jesus sacrifice. It’s a stretch, I think, to draw the conclusion that you did from what he said.
Did Christ advise us not to be judgmental … or not to be gay?
are you judging people for judging?
Point of clarity: The term “gay” used above is referring to the sin of homosexuality.
By the way, Jesus talked about Sodom and Gomorrah (you know, those “progressive” cities that God judged with fire and brimstone) more than anyone in the New Testament, and Jesus never spoke about them in a positive light (note Jesus’ statement that Sodom and Gomorrah’s will face terrible judgement –hmmm….judgement for what?).
For those who say the New Testament has nothing to say about homosexuality, only those who are limited to repeating what others have said believe that. Check this out: http://enrichmentjournal.ag.org/201103/201103_092_hom_understnd.cfm
I do not like Obama one bit, nor do I like liberal theologians, prosperity preaching, or scripture twisting. And as much as I disagree with the presidents stand on the sacred institution of marriage , I must admit that I feel you have twisted his words about as badly as I have heard prosperity preachers twisting scripture. Sure, he is wrong in his views and I doubt he has truly been converted by the Holy Spirit – but to take the paragraph you are critiquing and to squeeze it to mean what you say is just not right.