Michael Gerson, the “reluctant evangelical” as I call him, has a helpful op-ed at The Washington Post. The religious confusion exhibited by the cross-denominational support for Mormons by Catholics and Catholics by Evangelicals points to a frenzied evangelical political engagement.
Religion in the 2012 presidential election is the topic that will launch a thousand PhD theses. The pre-Vatican II Catholic candidate, Rick Santorum, has risen largely on the support of evangelicals, who, before the Second Vatican Council, often regarded the pope as the Antichrist. The former Mormon bishop, Mitt Romney, won Ohio and Michigan (and thus probably the nomination) arguably because of Catholic support. Meanwhile, a significant portion of the Republican electorate regards a president who has affirmed “the resurrection of our savior Jesus Christ” as a closet Muslim.
[...]
In light of these developments, Americans have every right to be confused. But they hold one conviction about the role of religion in politics with increasing clarity: There is too much of it. A recent survey by the Pew Research Center found that 38 percent of Americans believe there is “too much expression of religious faith and prayer from political leaders.” This is up from 29 percent in 2010.











>Meanwhile, a significant portion of the Republican
>electorate regards a president who has affirmed “the
>resurrection of our savior Jesus Christ” as a closet
>Muslim.
Meanwhile, Obama has also “affirmed” that he seeks the radical Islamist Turkish prime minister’s advice on raising girls (the prime ministers’ daughter is schooled outside Turkey so she can wear head coverings and be an in-your-face muslim). Because nothing tells you how to raise daughters well like radical Islam.
With that and about a hundred other things … gee, where *would* ever get such a crazy notion, about Obama as closet muslim?