Nation of Bastards: Essays on the End of Marriage
reviewed by Allan Carlson
The Preamble to the 1960 Canadian Bill of Rights affirms that “the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the protection of the family in a society of free men and free institutions.” Paul Martin, Sr., the statesman who drafted this document, wanted a Canada committed to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, especially those passages concerning “the sanctity and inviolability of the family as the fundamental unit of society.”
Douglas Farrow’s Nation of Bastards details the vast moral and social revolution that has occurred in the Great White North over the last fifty years. He borrows his title from a label once directed at the French, reputedly by Mark Twain. Farrow, who teaches Christian Thought at McGill University in Montreal, concludes that “Nation of Bastards” now has a new relevance: “Same-sex marriage makes bastards of us all, and as a nation of bastards we are all wards of the state.”
Chattels of the State
Notable is Farrow’s application of the term “natural” to his analysis. A Roman Catholic with a keen understanding of natural law, he sees Canada’s “divorce from traditional marriage” through recent court decisions and parliamentary actions as creating “a nasty custody battle between the state and the natural family unit for the country’s children.” He labels authentic marriage “naturally procreative” and blasts the parliamentary legislation that dismantled the language of “natural parent” in favor of “legal parent.” Where “nature provides for only two parents,” Canadian law may now, if it chooses, “provide for more,” such as the “three-parent” family recently created by an Ontario court.
While consistently fair to his opponents, Farrow openly reports on their deeper, radical motives. He cites the reasoning of gay activist Michelangelo Signorile that the superior approach to winning homosexual rights “might be to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, [to] redefine the institution of marriage completely.” As another GLBT theorist explains, “Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family,” and thence to “radically reordering society’s view of reality.”
The core political issue in the same-sex marriage debate is actually the relation between family and liberty. Farrow persuasively argues that marriage, when viewed through a classical Christian lens, “is a bulwark of human freedom within the state, and if need be, over against it.” Family and faith are central to the survival of liberty, as the unique “foundries” for the production of people oriented toward ordered liberty. The separation of marriage from procreation radically alters the equation. Farrow shows how the Canadian state has used human-rights discourse on homosexuality to clear “the path to state tyranny,” weakening the only natural institution in its way. The result of this reinvention of marriage has been to make “every man, woman, and child a chattel of the state.”
The author admits that the eighteenth-century French writer Jean Jacques Rousseau was “prescient” in identifying marriage as an “important” future political-cultural battleground. However, given his own weird moralizing, Rousseau failed to realize that a land composed only of bastards—those born outside of Christian marriage—would actually create his ideal state, with nothing standing between each individual and the government.
The Conquest of Marriage
Farrow reveals, as well, that the true effect of Canadian court rulings on same-sex marriage has been the liberation of both citizens and state from the claims of influence by the Christian churches. Such decisions expanded the distinction between civil marriage and religious marriage, effectively eliminating the latter. These rulings also reflect a powerful convergence of interest between Canada’s federal government and the “gay community.” The author predicts that, after destroying real marriage, the state will “turn its attention more directly to the problem of religion and in particular of the Catholic Church.” The goal will be the complete suppression of Christian influence in the public square.
Anticipating this challenge, Farrow considers what form of “secularism” might suit the twenty-first century. He rejects the neutrality of Lockean liberalism together with the modified, pluralistic communitarianisms of William Galston and David Novak. Instead, he describes a “Christian secularism” that distinguishes this battered, troubled age from the Kingdom to Come. Such a secularity would be modest in its claims, asking judges and politicians to craft a public order that allows persons to prepare for the ultimate good and that encourages “a political life that is both empowered and restrained by knowledge of the good.”
The cover of this fine and wise little book features the Doni Tondo, Michelangelo’s extraordinary portrait of the Holy Family. Where contemporary historians such as Stephanie Coontz conclude that romance has triumphed over the historic institution of marriage, so opening the way to “same-sex” unions, Farrow responds that “Love has [indeed] conquered marriage”—specifically, the Love and devotion to be discovered in the familial trinity of Mary, Joseph, and the child Jesus. As Nation of Bastards shows, this remains the only real alternative for our troubled civilization.
Letters Welcome: One of the reasons Touchstone exists is to encourage conversation among Christians, so we welcome letters responding to articles or raising matters of interest to our readers. However, because the space is limited, please keep your letters under 400 words. All letters may be edited for space and clarity when necessary. firstname.lastname@example.org
“Custodial State” first appeared in the January/February 2010 issue of Touchstone. If you enjoyed this article, you'll find more of the same in every issue.
An introductory subscription (six copies for one year) is only $29.95.