Voting for Pontius Pilate
On a spring Good Friday morning nearly two thousand years ago, Jesus Christ told a representative of the powerful Roman government that his kingdom was not of this world, and that he had been born to “bear witness unto the truth.” Pilate responded, “What is truth?” The skeptical and relativist Pilate earned himself a permanent place on the lips of Christians ever since: “Suffered under Pontius Pilate” reads the Apostles’ Creed; “Crucified under Pontius Pilate” reads the Nicene Creed. His politically expedient judgment resulted in the shedding of the Blood of the Innocent One. A day has not gone by in two thousand years when his name, and his dishonor, have not been publicly remembered.
Today, all those having public authority must answer the same question. If they do not, or if they answer it as Pilate did, they will, like him, conduct public affairs as if expedience were the only measure. And, like him, they will be responsible for shedding innocent blood. The blood they shed will be Jesus’ blood, for he said, “As you do unto the least of these, you do unto me.”
Today we are witnessing politicians who claim to be followers of Christ acquiescing in the destruction of millions of human lives through abortion. They vote as if to say, “What is truth?” They say they are “personally opposed” but will not “impose” their “private views” upon others. At the same time, every Sunday, after remembering Pilate’s crime in the words of the Creed, they take upon their lips the Body and Blood of the One whom Pilate had crucified that Good Friday.
Pilate washed his hands after sentencing Jesus Christ to say that he had no responsibility for his death. It was all politics. It needed to be done. Sacrificing the occasional innocent man was what a governor had to do to maintain Roman rule and public order. What is truth, after all, that riots and rebellion should be risked just to save an innocent man?
But no amount of question begging, political posturing, or philosophizing can wash away the bloodstains on the hands of those who support abortion; only the tears of repentance and the waters of baptism can do that. And for those already baptized, only fresh tears of repentance.
What can be said for those who support such politicians? They vote as if to say, “What is truth?” But citizens today have choices. Just like Pilate. And their choices have consequences. Just like Pilate’s.
—James M. Kushiner & David Mills, for the editors
James M. Kushiner is the Executive Editor of Touchstone.
David Mills is executive editor of First Things. He was editor of Touchstone from 2003-2008. His most recent book is Discovering Mary: Answers to Questions About the Mother of God (Servant Books). He is living with his wife and two of their four children in Manhattan, where they attend Immaculate Conception church.
Letters Welcome: One of the reasons Touchstone exists is to encourage conversation among Christians, so we welcome letters responding to articles or raising matters of interest to our readers. However, because the space is limited, please keep your letters under 400 words. All letters may be edited for space and clarity when necessary. email@example.com
“Voting for Pontius Pilate” first appeared in the April 2003 issue of Touchstone. If you enjoyed this article, you'll find more of the same in every issue.
An introductory subscription (six copies for one year) is only $29.95. This issue, as well as other issues, can be purchased at our online store. Read issues in digital format at the Touchstone digital archives! You can also subscribe to Touchstone at amazon.com to read on your Kindle.